How Coaching Works

Structure, Rhythm, and the Client’s Role

Many first-time clients enter coaching with assumptions shaped by their past development experiences.  Some expect a mentoring conversation.  Others anticipate a structured training session.  A few arrive wondering whether they will be given exercises, evaluations, or personality assessments.  These expectations are understandable, but they reflect only the outer edges of what coaching can be.  To engage coaching fully, clients benefit from understanding the basic structure of the process, the rhythm of a typical engagement, and the responsibilities that both coach and client share.

Coaching is built on intentionality.  Every session has a purpose, even when the conversation feels wide-ranging.  The International Coaching Federation describes coaching as a partnership that supports a client’s ability to generate insight, make choices, and move toward meaningful goals [1].  That partnership begins with clarity.  A coaching engagement usually starts with a discovery session, during which the coach and client lay the foundation for the work ahead.  This includes defining the client’s goals, understanding the context of those goals, and identifying desired outcomes.  These early conversations shape the direction of the engagement and help the coach determine the most effective approach for supporting the client’s growth.

Once goals are established, coaching follows a rhythm.  Sessions typically occur every 2 to 4 weeks, depending on the client's needs and availability within the engagement structure.  Each session begins with a relatively simple question: What matters most today?  This moment helps the client choose the session's focus.  Sometimes the priority aligns directly with the long-term coaching goals.  Other times, the most crucial issue is immediate, such as a difficult conversation, a leadership challenge, or a decision with meaningful consequences.  The structure allows space for both.

Phases of Coaching

A coaching session often moves through three phases.  The first is exploration.  The coach invites the client to unpack the issue with clarity and honesty.  This is not an analysis for its own sake.  It is an intentional examination designed to surface underlying assumptions, motivations, constraints, and perspectives.  Skilled coaches use questions to help clients see patterns that are difficult to spot alone.  Research in leadership development consistently shows that structured reflection of this kind is one of the strongest predictors of sustained behavior change [2].

The second phase is insight.  Insight is the moment when the client begins to recognize a new possibility or reframe the issue.  Insight is not always dramatic.  Sometimes it emerges as a subtle shift in understanding.  Other times, it arrives as the recognition of a long-standing pattern that has shaped decisions without notice.  Coaching is effective because it makes these moments more frequent and more accessible.  A large body of coaching research, including a meta-analysis published in The Journal of Positive Psychology, demonstrates that insight coupled with goal-directed action significantly improves performance, resilience, and confidence [3].

The third phase is action.  Coaching without action remains an interesting conversation but fails to create change.  Effective coaching translates insight into concrete commitments.  These commitments are chosen by the client, not the coach, which is one of the strongest predictors of follow-through.  Research published in Consulting Psychology Journal confirms that clients who design their own actions and strategies during coaching demonstrate higher accountability and more lasting improvement [4].  The coach’s role is to ensure that commitments are specific, meaningful, and realistic within the client’s context.

Between Sessions

Between sessions, clients test the ideas, behaviors, and strategies they identified.  The period between sessions is often where the most significant growth occurs.  This is because coaching encourages experimentation.  Clients try new approaches, evaluate the results, and return to the next session with observations that shape the next phase of learning.  Organizations that track coaching outcomes consistently report higher engagement, more substantial leadership effectiveness, and improved team functioning when clients apply insights consistently in their daily work [5].

Confidentiality plays a central role throughout this process.  Clients must be able to examine sensitive challenges, interpersonal dynamics, and personal habits without fear of judgment or exposure.  The standards for confidentiality outlined in the ICF Code of Ethics require coaches to protect client information and to maintain boundaries that support a trusting partnership [6].  Without privacy, clients often restrict what they share, which limits insight and slows progress.

A coaching engagement can span 3 to 6 months, but the duration varies depending on the client’s goals.  Some clients choose short-term coaching for a defined transition, such as a new role or a significant shift in responsibilities.  Others prefer longer engagements to support ongoing leadership development.  Regardless of duration, the structure is shaped by the same principles: clarity of goals, consistent reflection, meaningful commitments, and accountability.

The Client’s Role

The client’s role in the process is active.  Coaching is not something that happens to a client.  It is something the client participates in.  The most successful coaching engagements share common client behaviors: honest reflection, openness to new perspectives, willingness to examine assumptions, and commitment to taking action between sessions.  These behaviors amplify the impact of coaching and accelerate progress toward goals.  They also allow the coach to serve as a true partner rather than a source of answers.

Over time, clients often begin to internalize the coaching process.  They learn to pause more frequently, to question assumptions, and to make deliberate choices rather than reactive ones.  They carry these habits into their daily work and into future roles.  This is one reason coaching is considered a capacity-building practice rather than a corrective tool.  Studies conducted by the Human Capital Institute and others show that organizations with strong coaching cultures see broader organizational benefits, including improved communication, higher engagement, and stronger leadership pipelines [5].

Conclusion

Coaching works because it combines structure with flexibility, insight with action, and reflection with accountability.  It gives clients the space to reflect deeply on their work, leadership, and long-term development.  It also provides a disciplined process that supports meaningful progress.  When clients understand this structure and step into the process with clarity and intention, coaching becomes one of the most effective tools for sustained professional growth.

References

[1] International Coaching Federation.  (n.d.).  ICF Core Competencies.

[2] DeRue, D. S., & Wellman, N. (2009).  Developing leaders via experience: The role of developmental challenge, learning orientation, and feedback availability.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 859–875.

[3] Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & Van Vianen, A. E. (2014). Does coaching work?  A meta-analysis of the effects of coaching on individual-level outcomes in an organizational context.  The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1–18.

[4] Boyce, L., Jeffrey, R., Laura, J., & Neal, J. (2010).  Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program.  Journal of Management Development.

[5] Human Capital Institute & International Coaching Federation.  (2016).  Building a Coaching Culture for Increased Employee Engagement.

[6] International Coaching Federation.  (n.d.).  ICF Code of Ethics.

Next
Next

Understanding Coaching